|
(leer en español)
On Sunday, April 15, around 50 SOA Watch organizers gathered at Georgetown Law School in DC. Local organizers were represented from across the country including California, Georgia, New York, Florida, and DC! The morning started out with a movement timeline looking at SOA Watch in the context of what was happening throughout Latin America and the United States. We discussed how the movement has evolved over time and the shifts in tacts that people observed. We then split up into four breakout groups, Direct Action, Legislative, Education and Outreach, and Local Organizing. Each group discussed these different areas, shared experiences and success stories, and focused on concrete plans to enhance our organizing work.
More to come on updates and work plans coming out of the strategy session to follow in the next couple of weeks. Contact
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
for more information or questions.
Thanks to Georgetown Law School's Students for a Sensible Drug Policy (SSDP) for
hosting the strategy sessions.
Read below for the report backs from Legislative, Education and Outreach, Direct Action and Local Organizing!
Facilitators: Legislative Working Group (Rebecca Kanner, Alison Snow, Ellen Barfield, Theresa Cameranisi)
This session focused on identifying ways to support various aspects of the legislative work. We wanted to come up with specific ideas and plans for achieving the following three goals: 1. Making the legislative work to close the SOA/WHINSEC a key component of the movement and putting the SOA on the national agenda 2. Building alliances with and working with groups doing similar legislative work (both on the the locally level and nationally) 3. Empowering local groups to do legislative work throughout the year, not just in April and November
After discussing the history of the legislative work to close the SOA and where we are now with that work, we talked about the three goals and how they relate to the work. Then we broke up into three small groups. Each group brainstormed around one of the goals, sharing ideas on how to reach it and further flushing out what it means. (See below for the brainstorm ideas generated by each group.) Before the break, each group reported back on their brainstorm ideas.
During part two of the session, we worked on taking the ideas generated in the brainstorms and developing concrete plans for each goal. First, we shared our own successes and perceived failures in the legislative work. Pam Bowman joined us to give a briefing on the current political atmosphere in Congress, particularly in the House, and how this can impact our strategies. She talked about the emphasis on budget and spending, the upcoming required cuts to the military budget, and the lack of bipartisanship.
Then we prioritized the ideas from the small group brainstorms by having each participant identify their top three ideas for each goal. Each person made three tally marks for each goal. Then we counted the tally marks each idea received. (The number in parentheses by the ideas under each goal in the brainstorm shows the number of tally marks that idea received; no number means no one chose that idea in their top 3.)
The group rated the following as the highest priority for 2012:
1. Organizational Sign-on Letter 2. Develop relationships with Congressional staffers in district and DC offices 3. Educate ourselves on issues/get facts 4. Approach allies to lobby together 5. Research and ally with groups working on military training issues and collaborate 6. Bringing Latin American speakers to US to lobby
We wanted to come up with a list of concrete tasks for each of these priorities. However, there wasn't time to address them all. The organizational sign on letter idea received the most votes and was on each of the three goal lists so we put that as number one. Then we took the top rated idea from each goal. These are the actions we came up with for each and this was our report back to the larger group:
Organizational Sign-On Letter ~ topic: cut SOA funding as part of mandated military spending cuts
1. Draft letter 2. Identify groups ~ national, regional, local 3. Develop sign-on procedure 4. Distribute letter to movement 5. Identify key Representatives; how cuts to be made
Develop Relationships with Congressional Staffers ~ District and DC Offices
1. Follow-up visits with thank you note within 1 week 2. Follow-up visits with calls, email, letters within 1 month 3. Research Congressional Members and find thing(s) to connect on 4. Go to at least one of their (Representatives/Senators) events within 6 months 5. Find other connections ~ schools, religious, interests, organizations 6. Focus on local power centers
Educate Ourselves (movement, grassroots)
1. Have a teach-in 2. Learn history/facts re SOA
Approaching Allies to Lobby Together
1. Who are our allies? Identify local groups ~ Veterans, Union, Religious, Groups working on Latin America, anti-militarization, immigration, others 2. Go to their events (local events) 3. Partner on related issues 4. Build relationships
Nonviolent Direct Action Facilitators Kathleen Desautels and Elizabeth Deligio
At the heart of the SOA Watch movement lies a willingness to use our bodies to demonstrate our opposition to the deadly training taught at the SOA.
The Strategy session started out with a history of nonviolent direct action in the movement to close the SOA. We use nonviolent direct action because it is necessary and effective. In Argentina, daily demonstrations by the Mothers of the Disappeared caused the fall of the SOA-led dictatorship that claimed 30,000 lives. In Bolivia in 2003, campesinos and workers transformed their entire government after the use of strategic nonviolent direct action forced their president to resign.
Creative civil disobedience has a long history in our movement. Father Roy’s original action - climbing a tree on the grounds of Fort Benning to broadcast Oscar Romero’s famous homily calling on soldiers to resist orders to kill their brothers and sisters - was unexpected, creative, and dangerous for him personally. We cross the line at Ft. Benning to stand in solidarity with activists in Argentina, Bolivia, Colombia, Brazil, Guatemala, Puerto Rico, Honduras, Haiti and Mexico and all the places where people are putting their bodies on the line to challenge imperialism, neoliberalism and military domination.
Taking action is indeed the only way to change the current existence of domination and oppression that occurs through military force. Our brothers and sisters throughout the world are putting their lives on the line in order to create change. Consider Chile, for example, where students, workers, environmentalists, and citizens are actively and continuously taking to the street in order to demand change in the neo-liberal policies that were installed under the Pinochet dictatorship. We, too, must take bold and courageous action in opposition to the US hegemonic domination polices.
Following a conversation about affinity groups, and roles for activists in nonviolent direct action, the group slip into two. The first group discussed possible action scenarios at the Fort Benning military base, where - for over twenty years - people from all walks of life have trespassed to call for the SOA's closure. These peacemakers have built a movement undeterred by harsh prison sentences and the Pentagon's smoke and mirrors campaign. Today, 245 individuals have served prison sentences of up to 18 months. These "Prisoners of Conscience" use their outrageous sentences to educate and awaken the public to the atrocities committed by SOA graduates. The second group discussed other creative actions that affinity groups can carry out within their communities as well as during the April Days of Action in Washington, DC.
Local Organizing Session
Facilitator: Andrew Willis Garcés
This session served to give ideas for local organizing around the SOA/WHINSEC issue. The movement to close the SOA/WHINSEC has always relied on local groups organizing different actions and events in their communities throughout the year, not simply mobilizing for the yearly vigil at Ft. Benning. The session started out with examples of local organizing in SOA Watch. Representatives from SOA Watch San Francisco (CA), Long Island (NY), Columbus (GA) and Cleveland (OH) shared with the group their successes and problems in organizing. The SOA Watch Columbus chapter talked about their upcoming work to get a local NAACP resolution renewed against the SOA/WHINSEC (leading to a national resolution), as well as their work at the upcoming June SOA/WHINSEC Board of Visitors meeting. Different ideas for local organizing events and actions were thought up, as well as connecting with the Occupy Movement. We also mapped out groups we have worked with locally, and groups we would like to build more relationships with. Also looking at the electoral year and how we can do events in our communities to connect SOA with other relevant issues.
Ideas for Events/Actions film screenings public talk get allies to endorse Map connections (labor, religious, anti-war, students, civil rights, immigration, vets, youth, high school Resources on soaw.org target Board of Visitors members school presentations on “human rights” scholarship program for vigil--require to volunteer/participate theater/arts get opinion pieces published resolutions passed at local level bird-dogging on presidential candidate campaign trail. Getting local group to get one question about SOA/WHINSEC during town hall meetings, to get candidates on public record
Tips for Building Your Group
Don't expect everyone to be at every meeting Make meetings social/have food Plan your work and work your plan Create opportunities to plug-in Connect to other issues (i.e., Occupy) Create connections to staff (Skype events) Stay in touch! Send/Share relevant news Have a core planning group/board Engage people between events
Tips for Building Alliances
Approach on common ground/shared interest Make it personal Tell personal stories (Monsanto and SOA) Think about their interest (financial) Connect to larger (North-South) struggle Look for contacts through existing networks Gestures! Express appreciation Just show up Expose (il)logic of militarism
Building Alliances Groups/sectors you have worked with:
Vets for Peace Autoworkers Migrant Workers Sierra Cluba Anti-war christians refugees CODEPINK NAACP Jobs with Justice Project South Peace Studies Departments Women's International League for Peace and Freedom Unitarian Universalists housing rights organizations OCCUPY Immigrant detention orgs Lutherans Quakers Health centers
Groups sectors you haven’t worked with:
Academics schools Palestine Solidarity Queers/ LGBT (centers) Food Justice Black Student Groups Congressional Black and LAtino Panamanian Association Theatre/ Arts (Alternate Roots) Animal Rights organizations anti-violence (V-Day) Highlander Center Community Media Corporate sector graffiti artists climate activists think tanks Native/First Nation Peoples Undocumented Youth City Councils Political Parties
Education and Outreach Summary Facilitators: Maia Rodriguez and Becca Polk
This session mostly focused on ways to enhance local organizers methods of doing education and outreach in their communities. We started out with an activity generating a list of things that SOA Watch does well in terms of education and outreach and things the need to be improved. See below for the brainstorm. Part two of the breakout session was aimed at building strategies within 3 major areas to focus on: Political education of the culture of militarism, Resources for local education and outreach, Methods to learn/share from anti-militarization struggles across the Americas. See below for some of the plans people came up with.
We recognized that SOA Watch as movement has been instrumental in education thousands across the Americas about militarization. It continues to be a platform for politicization and opens doors to many other social justice movements. For this reason, it is important that we continue to strengthen our strategies for education. We want grassroots organizers to feel empowered to develop and share education tools and outreach strategies that they are using. Please contact Becca at
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
for more information.
Things SOAW does well
intergenerational outreach and communication cross-cultural balance Traditional vigils/speakers Collecting info/contacts the vigil: st. convention center helping people take a life-long commitment to peace and social justice roys talks, example and outreach personal relationships/word of mouth-- “social media” Having a focus: closing the School of Americas Improving communication about delegations, work in between the big events, etc. Use of acting and theater and puppets to connect peoples souls t the movement
Areas to strengthen/ needs improvement
Outreach to youth beyond the Vigil Vigil: Bringing youth and newer folks to the vigil provide local organizations with tools and flyers ground anti-militarization work to local campaigns(ex. In London, Ontario campaign against local construction of army tanks Building alliances with partner organization in Lat. Am. Listening process, seeing ourselves as S-N learners More clarity and strength in conveying that “we struggle for much more than shutting down the SOA”, Mass media coverage- documentary, make our own media and social networking Consistent, concise message lack of sophistication in internet activism (in comparison to MoveOn.org)
Strategies/Plans Anti-Militarization from the Inside Out -connect fair trade and militarism -unpack benefits global north gets from militarism -gather local info/activities and make available nationally -develop template for recording info -Identify intern/activante/ volunteers to develop educational toolkits/curriculums -post on website
Bridges not Bases -Research bases in LA (coordinate nationally) -Find local connection -have delegations to/from base areas -Use as a local organizing tool
Political Education -Educating different groups of social entities ie unions, teachers/ professors, social workers, mental health practitioners -To get two professional groups to formally endorse de-militarization and commit to act upon this endorsement -Military spending is a benefit of the 1% and detriment of the 99%-Austerity -Specific strategies for each social group that is approached
How to build Knowledge in those who don’t know -slide show for friends/ family/groups after travel -personalize the issue/connect -community presence (vs. worldwide) -utilize personal strengths -strength in numbers -- spread across different regions/sharing fields of experience between representatives (SOAW) and new constituents -Focus time and energy on those who are interested, throw away contact for those not interested
|